Chicago DUI attorney comments on the DUI arrest of a former MADD leader

Whoa!  This Chicago DUI attorney can admit she’s as taken aback as many others about the recent arrest of a former MADD chapter president.

February 24, Gainesville, FL:

 A former president of the defunct local chapter of Mothers Against Drunk Driving was arrested recently by the Gainesville Police Department on a DUI charge.

 Debra Oberlin, 48, was arrested after she had difficulty on a field sobriety test. She registered a .234 and .239 on breath alcohol tests. Florida's legal limit for driving is .08.

 Gainesville's MADD chapter existed for several years in the 1990s before closing in 1996 because of lack of financial support. Oberlin was the chapter president for three years.

 The words that come to my mind come from the people:

Seriously??????!!!!!!

Oh, the irony!!

 The irony is the lady who founded MADD was also arrested and found guilty of drunk driving some years back.

 Definition of irony...

 LMAO

 Seriously?!

 

Chicago DUI attorney comments on the problems with the changes to the MDDP law

This Chicago DUI attorney posted here about the changes to the MDDP law.  Specifically, judges were taken out of the process effective last week when Governor Quinn signed the law.  Unfortunately, it has not been a smooth transition.

It’s the classic Abbott & Costello bit “Who’s on First?” 

So here’s the problem.  Let’s say you were charged with a DUI around the middle of January.  Your first court date is after the new law went into effect.  In some cases, the judge is refusing to sign the MDDP.  The problem with that is you may need to contact the Secretary of State to participate in the program.

It’s going to be a bit of a rough ride in the interim it appears.  

Chicago DUI attorney comments on the new DUI law that takes judges out of the process

It is done.  This Chicago DUI attorney has most recently mentioned the problem of the MDDP and courts here.  Now, effective on Valentine’s Day, the MDDP no longer requires giving a judge a forum to belittle the defendant or attempt to get the defense attorney to bargain over a client’s right by withholding their signature from the MDDP.

Public Act 96-1526:

Synopsis As Introduced

Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Removes the authority of the courts to order the issuance of a monitoring driving device permit (MDDP) and grants the authority to the Secretary of State. Provides that persons issued a MDDP and who must drive a farm tractor to and from a farm, within 150 air miles from the originating farm are exempt from installation of a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID) on the farm tractor, so long as the farm tractor is being used for the exclusive purpose of conducting farm operations. Effective January 1, 2011.

Senate Floor Amendment No. 2

Replaces everything after the enacting clause. Amends the Illinois Vehicle Code. Removes the authority of circuit courts to order the Secretary of State to issue a monitoring device permit (MDDP) to an eligible first-time DUI offender, and instead, provides for the automatic issuance of a MDDP by the Secretary to an eligible first-time DUI offender. Provides that the eligible first-time DUI offender may file a petition to decline issuance of the MDDP with the court of venue. Provides that persons issued a MDDP and who must drive a farm tractor to and from a farm, within 50 air miles from the originating farm, are exempt from installation of a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device on the farm tractor so long as the farm tractor is being used for the exclusive purpose of conducting farm operations. Provides that the Secretary shall adopt rules for methods for determining indigency with respect to persons eligible for a MDDP. Makes other changes. Effective January 1, 2011.

Onward and Upward!

Chicago DUI attorney comments on the passing of a Lion of Justice

We were away for the weekend.  My husband received an award for his stream conservation work from the Wisconsin State Council of Trout Unlimited.  Once I returned from court this morning I was shocked to find that James Ahern had passed.

From isba.org, on the occasion of The 2001 Laureate Award:

To anyone who practices traffic law in Illinois, it is well known that the "dean" of the traffic bar is James J. Ahern, senior. His law firm – Ahern, Maloney, and Moran with primary offices in Skokie –concentrates in the defense of DUI and representation in other traffic matters.

His reputation in the law has several dimensions. He is, first and foremost, an outstanding lawyer. He has appeared frequently in the Appellate and Supreme courts. He represents his clients' interests fully, professionally, and with compassion.

He also is known far and wide as an unselfish teacher. For over twenty years, he has been a member of the Executive Committee of the Illinois Traffic Court Conference. His development of scenarios faced by traffic law attorneys and the panel discussion of these fact situations is a highlight of the annual conference. That part of the seminar is now referred to as "The Ahern Panel."

One of his nominators summed up Jim Ahern's career: He exemplifies the type of lawyer everyone wanted to be when they started law school.

 What do we do when a Lion of Justice passes?  We do our best to carry on.  We strive daily to be the type of lawyer he was.

Chicago DUI attorney comments on technology that won't let you drive drunk

This Chicago DUI attorney has posted here, and here about the future.  Specifically, about technology overtaking the ability to even get charged with a DUI, well not exactly true because in Illinois you can get charged with a DUI even if you aren’t driving, but that’s another post.

From Popular Science:

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that driving while under the influence of alcohol is a bad idea. Of course, when under the influence of alcohol the tendency is to think you are a genius (also: good looking, charming, interesting, a qualified referee, good at billiards). So a new technology incubating with the backing of the U.S. Department of Transporation would install sensors in automobiles than unobtrusively test drivers’ blood alcohol contents each time they climb behind the wheel.

The Driver Alcohol Detection Systems for Safety, developed by Waltham, Mass.-based QinetiQ North America, would employ sensors that would test a drivers BAC either through his or her breath or skin. Sensitive breath sensors installed in the cabin could grab respiratory samples from the air to dial in a driver’s BAC, or strategically-placed sensors on the steering wheel and door locks could analyze a driver’s skin to get a BAC reading before allowing him or her to fire up the engine.

 

Both technologies are nascent, and government officials admit that neither technology would see a commercial rollout for another decade most likely. Even then, they wouldn’t be mandated. U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood attended a demonstration Friday at which he said the tech is envisioned as an option, not a mandate.

Which is good, considering the amount of backlash that such a requirement would likely incur. Even with an issue like drunk driving—which pretty much everyone agrees is universally bad—Americans are already touchy about government regulation of their autos, and layering an automotive regulation on top of what some would surely call blatant government intrusion is a recipe for public ire.

Not to suggest this technology is a bad thing, but do you really think seat belts are mandatory, but this wouldn’t be?

Chicago DUI attorney comments on texting, talking, and driving

This Chicago DUI attorney has posted here, here, and here about distracted driving.  Can you believe it, looks like there’s an app for that?

From nytimes.com:

Cellular carriers, having spent years trying to blanket the nation with phone service, are now working on ways to stop people from getting calls and texts when they are behind the wheel.

 T-Mobile announced a service this week that, for $4.99 a month, automatically disables rings and alerts and sends calls to voice mail when the phone is in a moving car. Sprint Nextel and AT&T said they were exploring the technology, while Verizon Wireless has been cooperating with small companies to offer a similar service on its network.

The services being tested and deployed are voluntary and can be overridden if a driver needs to use the phone for an emergency. They face real challenges in that the technology, for now, cannot distinguish whether a phone belongs to a driver or a passenger — or, for that matter, a bus rider.

Some think it’s ridiculous to pay someone, like a trainer, to help you in your workout, have we reached a point where we will pay a company to disable our ability to talk or text?

Chicago DUI attorney comments on a new trend in DUI's across the country

I’m at the National College of DUI Defense’s Mid-Winter Session.

This time, perhaps because it is the start of the year, lawyers from across the country are making predictions.  Everyone starts to wonder if what they are seeing is specific to their state or is this something that they anticipate spreading throughout the nation.

What do you think of a charge of Driving Under the Influence of spice, K2, synthetic marijuana, in other words fake drugs?

From the New York Times:

 

SAN FRANCISCO — Reacting to what it called complaints from law enforcement and a surge in medical emergencies, the Drug Enforcement Administration said on Wednesday that it would ban several chemicals used to make so-called synthetic marijuana products, which resemble herbs or potpourri but mimic the effects of the drug when smoked.

 

n a notice published in the Federal Register, the agency said it would use its emergency powers to ban possession and sale of five synthetic cannaboids whose effects mirror that of tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, which gives marijuana its potency. Those chemicals are used to coat a variety of products which are marketed as incense, but have become popular as smokables for those seeking a legal high.

Under the action, the five cannaboids will be listed as Schedule I substances, the most restrictive category, for at least a year while the government studies whether they should be permanently banned.

The temporary action will take at least 30 days to take effect, meaning the products will not immediately be illegal. But on Wednesday, the acting agency administrator, Michele M. Leonhart, made it clear that she believes they are an imminent public safety threat.

“Makers of these harmful products mislead their customers into thinking that ‘fake pot’ is a harmless alternative to illegal drugs, but that is not the case,” she said in a statement.

The products, which began to appear in the United States in 2008, are sold in smoke shops and online under names like K2, Blue Dragon and Black Mamba Spice, and are marked with warnings saying “not intended for human consumption.” But according to the drug agency, those warnings are being ignored, leading to a variety of bad reactions, including agitation, vomiting, seizures and hallucinations.

Tony Newman, a spokesman for the Drug Policy Alliance, which seeks to liberalize the drug laws, said the ban seemed to be the wrong approach.

“The D.E.A. says that prohibiting synthetic marijuana will ‘control’ it — yet we know from history that prohibition is the complete opposite of drug control,” Mr. Newman said, adding that regulating and setting age limits would be a better approach than “relegating it to the black market.”

At one point do we stop fighting a losing war?