Chicago Police aren't the only ones who need video cameras for DUI arrests

Recently, I posted about Chicago DUI cops needing to have cameras in their cars, heck there is even supposed to be Federal Stimulus money available to equip over 200 cars in the city.  As a Chicago DUI lawyer I welcome video of stops and arrests.  Every time I have video in a case it makes my job easier.  It looks like the DUI cops in Maryland are also in need of cameras for their arrests as well:

May 6, Gaithersburg, MD

A Montgomery County Police officer faces a perjury investigation after she testified in April that she found a man arrested for driving under the influence behind the wheel of a parked car. A recording from a security camera showed he was in the back seat, lying down, with his feet out the open passenger side door when she approached him.

At his Montgomery County District Court trial, Officer II Dina Hoffman testified 11 times that she found Zaliev in the front driver's seat. She said shook him awake and he was not cooperative in doing field sobriety tests.

Zaliev's attorney, Paul E. Mack of Columbia, used a laptop computer to show a video from a security camera at Sarkissian that recorded the arrest.

The security tape, reviewed by The Gazette, shows Hoffman arrived and immediately walked up to Zaliev lying in the back seat.

After Judge Dennis A. McHugh viewed the tape, he ruled the arrest lacked probable cause. The judge found Zaliev not guilty.

n her testimony at the April 2 trial, Hoffman claimed she arrived and approached Zaliev on the left side of the car where he sat behind the wheel asleep. She described shaking his shoulder to wake him.

"He was just sitting in the front seat, kind of sitting there sleeping," Hoffman testified.

At several points Mack asked the officer if she was certain Zaliev was in the front and not the back.

"Do you recall him being in the back seat on the passenger side?" Mack asked on cross examination.

"No, not when I first got there, no," Hoffman replied.

"Are you absolutely sure?" Mack asked again.

"Yes," Hoffman testified. "I did have him sit there while I waited for another officer to come."

After the recording was played in the courtroom, Hoffman was asked whether she was wrong about Zaliev's position in the car.

"Yeah, I must have been," Hoffman testified. "My apologies. It's been over a year. I deal with a lot of these cases every day so my apologies."

But Hoffman then said Zaliev "must've admitted to me that he was driving the vehicle at some point."

On further questioning, Hoffman testified she had not told that to either the prosecutors or to Mack before.

"You were wrong about him giving you his license while he was in the front seat?" Mack asked.

"Yes," she said. "He gave me his license, but I guess he was in the back seat."

If Zaliev had been convicted, he would have faced a maximum sentence of $1,000 fine and a year in jail.

"If it was determined there's perjury in this case, this is the kind of case that would undermine the authority of police and the perception of good officers out there doing their job," said Christopher Heffernan, chairman of the Maryland State Bar Association's litigation committee. "This would damage the police officers who are doing a good job out there to protect us. This is disturbing to everyone who looks up to the police and relies on them to protect us from the bad guys."

Do I really need to say anything else? Watch the video and let me know what you think.